For some residents, there is more to home than just the windfall from a collective sale, even if that means blocking their neighbours’ bid to sell
THESE days, 72-year-old Madam Mavis Lee postpones her morning walk until her neighbours have left for work, so that she does not have to worry whether they will interrogate her, or just ignore her completely.
She is neither a criminal nor a bad neighbour, just one of several home owners in her Adam Road estate who rejected a collective sale proposal. And many of her neighbours are upset about it.
‘They used to smile and said ‘hello’ when we met, but now they just stare right through me. Sometimes, they would ask why I’m so stubborn and what’s the point of holding on. It’s very stressful,’ said Madam Lee.
With the promise of windfall sales sparking a new wave of ‘en bloc’ fever, stories like hers are being played out across the island.
Housewife Marie Tan, for example, loved her apartment in Bukit Timah so much that she wrote to The Straits Times Forum page earlier this month, lamenting that collective sale bids often create tension in her estate between those who agree to sell and those who do not.
Like Madam Lee, 35-year-old Madam Tan does not want to sell. She has lived in her freehold three-bedroom apartment with her husband and three children for eight years.
‘Those who wanted to sell have been civilised enough to not do anything negative to those who didn’t, but the whole community is split and there is a certain tension in the air,’ she said. ‘You belong either to the yes or no group. There’s a lot of second-guessing and awkwardness.’
In fact, all five home owners The Sunday Times spoke to asked for their estates not to be named to avoid bad blood with their neighbours.
For an entire development to be put up for collective sale, 80 per cent of home owners must agree. If the estate is less than 10 years old, that number is increased to 90 per cent.
It is not difficult to see why there has been a renewed surge in collective sale proposals in the past year, after a downturn in 2000.
Earlier this month, the freehold Eng Lok Mansion in Napier Road was sold en bloc and each of the 64 owners there will receive $2.16 million, about twice the market value.
Last weekend, Paterson Tower was sold for $266 million, with the owners of each apartment to receive $3.7 million.
Owners of apartments in collective sales typically pocket between 30 and 50 per cent more than what their properties are worth individually on the open market.
The buyers are usually developers, who tear down the existing properties and replace them with new estates with more units and communal facilities like swimming pools.
But to the five home owners interviewed, the notion of home is more important than the prospect of pocketing up to $900,000 for an apartment that may have cost $500,000.
Madam Tan said: ‘It is our first home after marriage, a place where I became wife and then mother to my three children. Their first steps and their first words all happened in this humble but cosy nest.’
Madam Lee, a widow, is afraid of having to start afresh. ‘I can’t imagine moving to a new estate at my age. I’ll have to find out things like where to buy groceries and what bus to take to visit my grandchildren,’ she said.
Said businessman H.C. Lim, 43, who lives in East Coast with his family of five: ‘My apartment is more than a home. It is from my late parents and it reminds me of their love.’
Sentimental ties play a big part in residents’ decisions to reject collective sales, said Mr Jeremy Lake, executive director, investment properties, at property consultant CB Richard Ellis. The property’s location and the fear of not being able to find a comparable home in the area are other important factors, he said. Of course, Mr Lim, Madam Tan and Madam Lee would have no choice but to move if 80 per cent of the owners agreed to the sale of their estates.
According to Mr Karamjit Singh, executive director of collective sale specialist Credo Real Estate, there are several grounds for objection - like if the process to sell the estate en bloc was not carried out according to guidelines or the collective sale proceeds were not enough to pay off existing housing loans - but sentimental attachment is not one of them.
For now, home owners opposing collective sales can only hope neighbours see beyond the dollars and cents of their property.
Said Madam Lee: ‘Part of a person’s identity is tied to the neighbourhood he lives in. How I wish the rest could see that.’
ngsls@sph.com.sg
‘It is our first home after marriage, a place where I became wife and then mother to my three children. Their first steps and their first words all happened in this humble but cosy nest.’ — HOUSEWIFE MARIE TAN on why her private apartment is not for sale
Source : Sunday Times - 26 Mar 2006