Make SgHousing your default homepage
Add SgHousing to your favourites
EMail This Post

Can my father’s Muslim siblings make claim on his assets?

Q I AM an only child and my father has two sisters and two brothers, all of whom are Muslim.

My father has two landed houses held in joint tenancy with me. I did not contribute financially to their purchase.

He also has investments in some foreign currencies and local bank accounts in our joint names. He holds one local bank account under his name. I’m the nominated beneficiary for his Central Provident Fund money.

Upon his death, which of the assets cannot be contested by his siblings? How should he reinforce my claim so that it will not be subject to the Muslim law of division? Can he draw up a will?

A UNDER civil law, joint tenants of a property have an equal interest in the property, regardless of the amount of money each co-owner has contributed towards its purchase.

When a co-owner dies, his share of the property will automatically pass to the remaining co-owner(s) regardless of whether the deceased joint tenant has left behind a will. Thus, upon your father’s death, you will become the sole legal and beneficial owner of both the landed properties.

However, things are different under Islamic law. You are entitled to only a half-share of the two properties. The other half-share is to be distributed according to faraid, the Islamic law of inheritance.

This is on the assumption that it was your father’s intention to give you a half-share when he included your name as a co-owner.

If not, the whole 100 per cent is subject to faraid.

Where there is a conflict of laws in matters such as joint tenancy, insurance and CPF nominations, the general rule is civil law overrides Islamic law.

Hence, your father’s siblings cannot, in law, claim for their faraid share of the two properties held in joint-tenancy.

However, as a believer, you may wish to consider waiving your rights under civil law and apply the Islamic law instead, and distribute the estate according to faraid as follows:

You as the only daughter/child: Half share

Your father’s siblings: Half share

Alternatively, your uncles and aunties may waive or disclaim their rights to their share after your father’s death. However, for you to deprive them of it is forbidden in Islam.

To avoid the application of faraid and any pressure from your father’s siblings to divide his joint ownership of properties, accounts and assets according to faraid, your father may wish to distribute his assets during his lifetime.

There are several ways to do this, including hibah (gift) and nuzriah (vow). He could seek an expert’s opinion on how this can be done.

As for you being named the beneficiary of your father’s CPF money, under the law, you will receive it for your personal use and benefit.

But under Islamic law, you are to receive it as the representative/trustee for the deceased’s estate for distribution according to faraid.

If it is your father’s intention to leave all his CPF money to you upon his death and to make it Islamic-compliant, then he could execute a nuzriah (subject to certain terms and conditions) in your favour so his siblings cannot contest it in law and in Islam.

As for the will, under the Administration of Muslim Law Act, a Muslim domiciled in Singapore shall dispose of his property by will only in accordance with Muslim law.

It allows a Muslim testator (that is, a Muslim who has a will) to dispose a maximum of one-third of his net estate to his non-waris or those who are not automatically entitled to his inheritance under faraid.

This is after payment of his debts due to God (for example, zakat or tithe), debts to his creditors, estate duty and his last expenses (including his medical, funeral and testamentary expenses).

The process of clearing these expenses is for the purification of a Muslim deceased’s estate.

The balance of his estate must be distributed according to faraid. A Muslim is not allowed to make a will in favour of his heirs, unless approved by the other heirs after his death.

Suhaimi SallehChairman Barakah Capital Planners

Advice provided in this column is not meant as a substitute for comprehensive professional advice. E-mail questions to chanteik@sph.com.sg

Source : Sunday Times - 1 Mar 2006

EMail This Post

En bloc & loaded

En bloc sales are back, but past beneficiaries of such sales say the monetary windfall is a mixed blessing

IT’S baaack: Singapore’s favourite bloc-buster: ‘Who wants to be a collective sale millionaire?’

Yup, en bloc fever is running high again, in the wake of the record-busting sale of Eng Lok Mansion in Napier Road earlier this month.

The 64 owners of apartments there will each receive a cool $2.16 million, about twice the market value.

In the process, they are making history as the happy recipients of the most expensive collective sale ever: the freehold property sold for $138 million.

They join the much-talked-about ranks of 5,000 homeowners who have scored an instant en bloc fortune since Singapore’s first collective sale in 1994.

The sums involved are staggering: In the years since then, an estimated 260 developments have been sold at an aggregate value of $12.8 billion, according to estimates from property consultancy Credo Real Estate.

Property developers like to buy up an estate in one go to take advantage of changing plot ratios enabling more bang for their buck on the land.

The result is that owners stand to get between 30 and 50 per cent more than what their properties would fetch if they sell them off individually.

‘It’s an amazing phenomenon that’s very unique to Singapore,’ notes Credo Real Estate’s executive director Karamjit Singh.

LifeStyle decided to track down some of these fortunate 5,000, to see how they have fared since striking the property equivalent of Toto.

But most turned down LifeStyle’s requests for interviews, citing fears of drawing attention to themselves and being seen as flaunting their wealth.

In 1999, after the collective sale of her property was sealed and she was sure she would pocket $1.1 million, Esther (not her real name) quit her bank executive job the very next day.

She had bought the walk-up apartment in the Moulmein area for a mere $220,000 in 1989.

‘The sale gave me the financial muscle to resign and pursue other things in life,’ she says.

Esther took a one-year break before returning to work in a few banks on and off over the past few years.

She invested about $900,000 of her windfall on a new private apartment, and parked the remainder in bonds, unit trusts as well as in the bank.

There was no shopping spree or buying binge. In fact, the 45-year-old single woman still lives simply - without a car or a maid.

Amazingly, she still worries about money. ‘My main concern is how to manage my funds so I can retire early and comfortably,’ she says.

Indeed, you might not want to get out the hankies for them, but life can be tough when you hit the en bloc jackpot.

Freelance IT specialist Alice (not her real name), 45, recalls how she noticed a distancing between her and the people around her after news got around that she had pocketed $1.6 million from the en bloc sale of her apartment in 1999.

‘People must have talked about me behind my back, although I’ve never heard anything malicious said to my face,’ she says.

For some, the successful closure of an en bloc sale is more of a ‘huge relief’ than a cause for celebration.

After three rounds of en bloc exercises, teacher Sally (not her real name), 56, finally sold her apartment near Newton Circus in 2004, making a profit of about $600,000.

‘For eight years, I was stuck in this crumbling house. I couldn’t sell, move or renovate,’ she says.

Then there are the ’serial en blockers’, a small but growing group of people who invest in one or more properties which have en bloc potential - usually older developments on large plots of land.

Knight Frank’s executive director Foo Suan Peng says: ‘Money is not an issue for these people. After we close a deal, they’ll immediately ask ‘So where’s the next en bloc sale?’ ‘

One en blocker who came out of the process relatively unscathed is property agent K.Y. Wong.

He made a profit of more than $500,000 when he sold his Calrose Gardens maisonette at Yio Chu Kang in 2004. He was content to downgrade, moving into a smaller unit at Lakeview Condominium at Upper Thomson Road.

‘I’m a simple man. I don’t feel rich. I don’t indulge in luxurious things,’ he says, in words that may be of some comfort to envious non-en blockers.

Jervois jackpot

WHO: Mr Lee Peng Shu, a 56- year-old businessman

WINDFALL: $975,000

LESSONS LEARNT: ‘You must forget and forgive - forget the difficulties you encountered in the en bloc process and forgive the unpleasant things which people might say to you in the heat of the moment.’

BUSINESSMAN Lee Peng Shu and his family hit the jackpot when both Jervois Court off River Valley Road and neighbouring Goldhill Mansion were sold en bloc in one fell swoop three years ago.

The lucky Lees, that is, Mr Lee, his four siblings and their late father, owned three units at Jervois Court and four units at Goldhill Mansion, including two shophouses, which cost them from as little as $70,000 - with the first purchase, back in 1971 - up to $770,000.

So the family was all smiles when the properties fetched $8 million in the en bloc sale, or a net profit of $5 million.

But en bloc sales are notoriously difficult to pull off - some stubborn property owners may refuse to sell, or want more than the others - and this was no exception.

One owner held out and at the eleventh hour, the sales committee - of which Mr Lee was chairman - agreed to give him a $50,000 ’subsidy’ to reach the 80 per cent majority required by law.

According to Mr Lee, this payment was supposed to be split among the seven committee members, but he paid the lot.

The sale came after two earlier attempts failed.

The first was in 1996. Amazingly, 100 per cent of owners were in favour, but alas, there were no buyers.

Then, in 1999, not enough sellers came forward to reach the 80 per cent mark required of estates more than 10 years old.

When Mr Lee is asked if he had doors slammed in his face during the drawn-out sales process, he says coyly: ‘I forget about these things.’

But asked when he received the cheque of near-on $1 million for his share of the proceeds after Centrepoint Properties’ $105 million purchase, the father of three pauses and says: ‘Of course I remember the date - Sept 14, 2004.’

Despite receiving the huge sum, he claims he had ‘no feelings at all’, as about $600,000 went straight away to paying off a loan on his new condominium apartment in the Bukit Timah area.

The rest was put in the bank.

He insists the sale had little impact on his life.

Indeed, he is already quite well-off - the family-owned company he runs is the sole distributor of Darlie toothpaste in Singapore.

Recalling the en bloc experience, he says: ‘After waiting so many years and attending more than 200 meetings, I was just so glad it was all over.’

Residents from Goldhill Mansion held a farewell party at a hotel and he was the last person to vacate the estate last March.

Apparently, there was also supposed to be a ‘celebration for my kampung’ at Jervois Court, but it never happened.

With a sad smile, he says: ‘After they got the money, they just forgot about it. That’s human nature for you.’

Despite that, he attributes the eventual en bloc sale to ‘kampung spirit’.

‘Everybody knew one another and we tried to achieve something together,’ he says.

While he has had one windfall, he is open to others: He would not hesitate to bite if a shophouse he owns in Genting Road is put up for collective sale one day.

‘En bloc sales are by chance, rather than effort. If I have another chance, I’ll just grab it.’

Mak Mun San

Sitting on a goldmineWHO: ‘Mrs Lim’, in her 50s, who runs her family’s furniture business. She did not want to reveal her real name

WINDFALL: $2.16 million

LESSONS LEARNT: ‘Tolerance and patience. You have to take the idiosyncrasies of different characters. Humans are greedy. Some people think we’re sitting on a goldmine. Everyone wants more and more. In hindsight, it’s true that we are sitting on a goldmine. But I never thought so until now.’

Mrs Lim remembers the night she found out she was going to be $2 million richer. She had returned home from work and had just settled on the couch to watch American Idol, one of her favourite programmes.

The phone rang. It was her older sister, who had just emerged from a meeting at property consultancy CB Richard Ellis’ office in Raffles Place bearing good news for Mrs Lim and the other 63 families in Eng Lok Mansion (left) in centrally located Napier Road.

Mrs Lim’s sister, who did not wish to be named, co-owns the apartment and is on the sales committee of the property, which was built more than 30 years ago. The committee had just made history by clinching the highest collective sale price ever - $138 million.

Yet, instead of jumping for joy, Mrs Lim said her first thought was a sobering one: ‘I’m leaving this apartment. We’ll be moving.’

After all, for 27 years, she and her husband had enjoyed the best of both worlds: a green sanctuary - the Botanic Gardens - to her right, a shopping haven - Orchard Road - to her left. Should anyone in the family need emergency medical attention, one of Singapore’s top hospitals, Gleneagles, was, literally, just next door.

She adds that even her 28-year-old bank officer son ‘wasn’t that exuberant. His friends phoned and congratulated him after reading about it in the news later and he said: ‘What’s so great about it? I’ll be out of Orchard Road’.

Eng Lok’s sale finally went through after four attempts in 10 years. The others failed because not enough owners wanted to sell.

Indeed, she says that ‘there are still people who don’t want to move out. A few of them are really old and they don’t want to uproot’.

‘We understand that. But the place is really quite old. If we do nothing now, eventually we will have to have a major overhaul, and you’ll never get the consensus.’

Mrs Lim and her sister have not discussed how to split the money. ‘Everyone will be househunting this weekend. But I won’t want to spend the total amount on one property. I’m not getting any younger. My priority is to save some for old age,’ says Mrs Lim.

She has two criteria for her new home: it must be a condo because she doesn’t like landed homes - ‘too much hassle’ - and be near her family members. Her mother, younger brother and older sister all live in the vicinity of her Napier Road home.

And how about a little celebration? She says there will be an extraordinary general meeting soon and ‘we told everyone, it should be a champagne party’.

Tan Dawn Wei

Don’t feed the frenzy

WHO: ‘Michael’, a 65-year-old former civil servant who declined to give his real name

WINDFALL: $1.8 million

LESSONS LEARNT: ‘Make your money grow by buying Singapore proxy stocks. Don’t get caught up in the global economic mania. A lot of purported investment experts will want you to part with your money. Don’t feed the frenzy.’

The saying ‘you win some, you lose some’ certainly applies to Michael.

In the mid-1990s, his two-bedroom maisonette was sold in an en bloc sale for $1.8 million. He had paid just $690,000 for it the year before.

Michael, who is single, had never slept one night in his maisonette. Not only that, but the newly retired civil servant had just poured $140,000 into extensive renovations on the 10-year-old unit.

Before the new paint on the wall had even dried, the en bloc word was going around the neighbourhood.

‘I was really frustrated. I was keen on living there because I wanted the privacy of a second floor.’ He was living in a condominium unit then.

Still, he went along with the wishes of his new neighbours and also became the chairman of the sales committee because ‘I decided I wasn’t going to let some cretin manage the sale’.

A hundred per cent of homeowners in the estate said ‘yes’ to the sale, which was mandatory according to regulations of that time. Of his $1.8 million cheque, $800,000 was left after paying taxes, and discounting what he paid for the apartment.

So far, so good. Then, disaster: He put the money in a bank as an investment, and ended up kissing most of it goodbye.

‘You suddenly find yourself holding a large amount of cash. You have to deposit it somewhere. The moment you find a bank, you’re in its sights already because you’re a high net worth individual.’

Most of that money went into mutual funds, on the advice of the bank’s relationship managers.

When the dot.com bubble burst in 2000, so did $750,000 of his money, which was parked there for four years. ‘I felt violated. I began to realise that I was just being made use of.’

Still, he has no regrets about the en bloc sale. ‘No one will say he regrets winning the Singapore Sweep. You regret how you mismanaged the money.’

He has since put what’s left, about $500,000 - he made some money from foreign currency deposits - into stocks. ‘If I had invested the money sensibly, I would probably have been travelling first class all over.’

Not that he would necessarily do so. ‘I don’t care for stylish cars and I see no reason to pay $1,200 when I can sit for $400 in the same plane and still get to the same destination.’ He still drives a basic Japanese sedan.

Despite the ups and downs, he says the sale gave him ‘options’ in life. ‘I still have the resources to go through the rest of my life comfortably. I can go into a retirement home if I choose to,’ says Michael, who now lives in a condominium apartment.

No splurges, just leeches

WHO: ‘Alice’, a 45-year-old freelance IT specialist who declined to be named

WINDFALL: $1.6 million

LESSONS LEARNT: ‘I’ve learnt how to say ‘no’ to people who want ‘loans’ from me. I’ve also realised that I’m not as materialistic as I thought I was. I’m not spending the way people would expect someone in my situation to spend.’

ALICE is a naturally friendly person. But once the conversation veers towards personal details such as how much she earns or where she lives, she clams up.

And it is with good reason: fear that yet more ‘leech’ friends and relatives will hit her for a loan.

‘Oh yes,’ the singleton says resignedly, ‘it has happened many times. In some cases, I didn’t lend them the money - I gave it away.’

However, she has since learnt to say ‘no’ after she realised ‘people were just taking advantage of me’.

Alice became an overnight millionaire in 1999 when the apartment in town which she had bought for about $400,000 in the early 1990s sold en bloc for $1.6 million.

She spent a large chunk of it on a new property. But not for Alice a mega-splurge down Orchard Road with the rest. Instead, she used the money to make more money, placing it in unit trusts and stocks under the advice of a personal financial planner. And now, she has an income stream off that.

She also took care to give to charity as well, she says.

But despite having riches that most people can only dream of, she insists that money has not changed her or her life in any major way.

The millionairess drives a modest 1,300cc Japanese car and goes on short trips around the region instead of taking the extravagant holidays in Europe that she could easily afford.

The restraint continues with retail therapy, or lack thereof. She says she shops less these days, although she does admit buying more expensive clothes.

Sounding almost nonchalant about her wealth, she says: ‘Before the en bloc sale, I was already investing. So the money I received only meant that there was more capital for me to invest.’

And she even kept on working for six months after her windfall, finally quitting because the hours clashed with her postgraduate course.

Nowadays, she still does work on a freelance basis, but picks only the jobs that are ’satisfying to me’.

‘I certainly do consider myself lucky. Blessed. I don’t have to work for a living. Not many people have the freedom to do that,’ she says.

The downside is, she has less hunger and drive now. Just last week, she turned down a freelance assignment because ‘I wasn’t comfortable with the people I would have to work with’.

‘It has always been part of my plan to live like this. It’s just that it happened faster than expected,’ she says.

Her advice for would-be en bloc gainers? ‘Don’t be greedy. The current offer may not come off, and then you would be left with nothing.’

Mak Mun San

Serial en blocker cleans up

WHO: ‘Jenny’, a 50-year-old marketing consultant who declined to give her real name

WINDFALL: $1.05 million

LESSONS LEARNT: ‘Do your homework and make sure you have the holding power. If you go in wanting to make a quick buck without the ability to invest long-term, then you can get burnt very easily.’

WITH one collective sale sealed and delivered last November, another cheque expected in September, and two other deals in the works, Jenny is what some might call a ’serial en blocker’.

But this is no property owner who has simply struck it lucky. The remarkable success of the 50-year-old mother of two has been due to research and calculated risk-taking.

‘I’m a serious investor. I don’t hit and run,’ she says.

The savvy buyer has studied the en bloc market since the early 1990s, looking and waiting for the right moment to invest.

It came in 2003, when she felt that the property market had hit rock bottom.

Jenny and her four siblings pooled about $860,000 to buy an old apartment in an area she did not want to disclose ‘for fear of being identified’.

Just two months later, they hit the jackpot. The estate was sold en bloc, and they bagged $1.05 million, making a tidy profit of about $200,000.

Each took only $10,000. The rest was ploughed back into an investment company owned by the family.

Jenny says: ‘I was very pleased with myself. I did my homework and knew which properties had already gone through two en bloc exercises. Those are the ones which its owners are keen to let go.’

Her nose for an en bloc bargain proved astute again when a property she and her siblings bought last July for $980,000 was sold collectively three months later. They will pocket $1.43 million from this sale.

Two other properties that she and her siblings have snapped up over the past year are currently going through the en bloc process.

The former civil servant, who now works part-time as a marketing consultant, admits it is easy money.

‘We didn’t expect it to go this well. I’d told my siblings to be prepared to wait up two to five years,’ she says.

When asked if she gets anxious and stressed out playing the waiting game, her instant reply is ‘no’.

‘We buy with the view of investment. We make sure we have the holding power and we’re prepared to be in this for the long haul,’ she says, adding that the rent they earn in the meantime is more than enough to cover the interest on the mortgage.

Some friends who went against her advice and bought properties which, in her words, ‘did not really have en bloc potential’, have ended up bankrupt, she says.

In any case, she says she and her siblings are going to slow down from now on.

‘One shouldn’t follow the herd. If everyone jumps in, then it’s time to get out. The trick is to catch the early wave.’

Source : Sunday Times - 12 Mar 2006

EMail This Post

Hit by en bloc sale fever? Not this sad home owner

I REFER to the report, ‘En bloc fever grips home owners’ (ST, March 8). Sales of entire property developments or estates are indeed the rage now.

Many an owner of apartment dwellings, whether in small developments or in larger but older estates, is eager to band together with fellow owners to sell the entire property as collective sales fetch an estimated 30-50 per cent more than what individual apartments would fetch on the open market.

An entire development can be put up for collective sale when 80 per cent (90 per cent for developments less than 10 years old) of the home owners agree.

Yet not everyone within the majority may have been willing to sell, to begin with. Often, it is a few prime-movers, who have much personal interest at stake, who drive the process. They work hard at every turn, in overt or covert ways, to convince other individuals so that the mandatory figure can be reached. At times, the not-so-overt ways employed is questionable.

Collective-sale efforts generate a lot of awkwardness and tension, if not outright divisiveness and animosity among neighbours, what with the second-guessing and suspicion - which side are you on?

But should we not ask the question: are we wasting resources with all this selling and buying of large-scale properties?

Another issue to consider is the notion of ‘home’. In all the excitement and rush - even panic - to launch collective-sale bids, the clear message that comes across is that the value of a ‘home’ is largely the monetary returns it can yield. Never mind that a home is a sanctuary for one to touch base with self and family, a retreat after a long and often hard day at work or at school.

Perhaps not every home owner attaches the same value to the property he owns. Some may own multiple properties so the secondary ones are dispensable.

But for other home owners, the property they live in is where many significant life events have taken place - marriages begun, children raised, values taught and learnt, routines established and habits formed. For this group of home owners, a collective-sale effort is both pressurising and unnerving.

There are rounds and rounds of talks, reasoning, negotiation. Sometimes there will be misunderstandings and, at times, intrigues. These all create undue pressure and an unpleasant atmosphere.

What is also unnerving is that the home that is a sanctuary can never be viewed in the same way again because a huge question mark hangs over its continued existence.

I am one such home owner, caught unwittingly in others’ feverish pursuit of the en bloc sale of our property.

Perhaps I attach too much emotion to my earthly home. It is not a fancy or swanky apartment by any standard but it is a cosy nest, a nice-enough space for my family to live in and enjoy amid lots of clutter and chatter.

It is a place which I am proud to call my home, its value to me is far more than the amount that the agent keen to market my development promises me.

Unfortunately, today I find it hard to enjoy the real value of my home when others insist on putting a monetary value to it.

Perhaps it is time to have a reality check on en bloc sales.

Source : Straits Times - 11 Mar 2006

EMail This Post

Bukit Sembawang buys Cairnhill site

BUKIT Sembawang Estates yesterday announced its second residential site purchase in two days.

This time, it has bought The Vermont at Peck Hay Road in the Cairnhill area for $75 million or about $750 per square foot of potential gross floor area, inclusive of a development charge.

Bukit Sembawang is expected to redevelop the 40,375 sq ft freehold site into a new 20-storey condo with about 80 units averaging 1,400 to 1,500 sq ft.

The project is expected to be launched next year. Analysts estimate its breakeven cost at about $1,050 to $1,100 psf.

The tender for The Vermont’s collective sale closed on March 3. CB Richard Ellis executive director Soon Su Lin, whose firm brokered the deal, said in a news release yesterday: ‘The tender received several good offers which were close in pricing. We awarded the site to the highest bid.’

She also said all owners of the existing 30 apartments at The Vermont, which was built in the mid-1980s, will receive close to 80 per cent more than what they would have pocketed had they sold their apartments individually.

The Vermont site is zoned for residential use with a 2.8 plot ratio (ratio of potential maximum gross floor area to land area).

On Tuesday, Bukit Sembawang, linked to the Lee family of OCBC, said it clinched Chez Bright Apartments at St Thomas Walk in the River Valley area through a collective sale.

It paid $54 million, or $625 per per plot ratio inclusive of an estimated $6.25 million development charge.

Bukit Sembawang can build a 36-storey project with about 70 units averaging 1,400 sq ft.

The Vermont is the fifth major site the group - dubbed ‘King of Seletar Hills’ after its massive landbank in the location - has bought after a seven-year hiatus.

Before the Chez Bright purchase, it bought last year Carlton Terrace on Holland Road, Woodleigh Grove and a site at Lengkok Angsa near Paterson Road comprising 32 landed houses.

Analysts expect the group to launch new projects on at least two of these sites later this year - a 97-unit condo on the Woodleigh site and a 24-storey condo on the Paterson site with about 90 units.

Bukit Sembawang Estates last month reported that its net profit for the third quarter ended Dec 31, 2005, surged to $21.8 million from $2.6 million.

Source : Business Times - 10 Mar 2006

EMail This Post

Foreign buyers keen on Draycott luxury condo

FOREIGN buyers are flocking to The Arc at Draycott, another luxury freehold project with apartment prices starting from $1.9 million.

A Hong Kong buyer has already snapped up five three- to four-bedroom units of the 58-unit development in the Ardmore-Draycott area.

And a Pakistani investor has bought two units, including the penthouse on the top floor.

BS Capital, which is developing The Arc, said local and foreign buyers from Hong Kong, Britain, France, Germany, New Zealand and Indonesia have shown strong interest.

The 36-storey condominium, which was previewed in Hong Kong, will be launched this weekend. Units - which range from 1,130 to 4,144 sq ft - cost an average $1,800-$1,850 per sq ft (psf), said CB Richard Ellis (CBRE), which is jointly marketing the project with Savills.

Sources said that since last October, there have been 25 caveats lodged for The Arc at $1,800 psf on average, one of which was lodged in January. Lodging a caveat is a key legal step in buying a property.

BS Capital bought the condominium site - formerly Falcon Crest - in September 2004 through a collective sale for $40 million, or $671 psf of potential gross floor area.

Its maiden project - 16 good class bungalows carved out of a 276,118 sq ft site at Bishopsgate - has seen higher prices, with the most recent deal hitting $579 psf, a level not seen since 1996, said a CBRE statement yesterday.

Set up in 2003 by a former director of now-troubled Citiraya Industries, Mr Raymond Ng, BS Capital also bought HMC Building near Shenton Way, for $20.5 million last year.

The firm said its next project is a 43-storey residential development that will be among the first few in the central business district to offer home-office living concepts.

Source : Straits Times - 9 Mar 2006

Page: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 11
For More Recommended Real Estate Books, Click SgHousing's Recomended Books