They were certain they would win
Resident who voted yes says he has only 2 words:
Disappointment & disbelief
Despite the objections filed by the minority, the majority owners of Tampines Court - more than 82 per cent - thought they could push through a collective sale.
Many of them had even scouted around and bought properties elsewhere.
But the en bloc sale of the former HUDC estate failed after the Strata Title Board (STB) dismissed its application yesterday.
Now those who have committed themselves to other properties are in a fix.
One owner told The New Paper: ‘I can’t think properly right now. I have to work out my sums and see how best to salvage the situation.’
The Board’s decision means the sale of the estate is off.
This is because the sales committee’s agreement with the buyers - Far East Organization and Frasers Centrepoint Properties - also expired yesterday.
The buyers, who had offered $405 million for the privatised HUDC estate, had also said they would not extend the agreement past the deadline.
Said one owner, who did not want to be named: ‘How can this be? Doesn’t the majority win?’
Another upset owner, who wanted to be known only as Mr Tan, said: ‘I have two words only. Just two. Disappointment and disbelief.’
And disbelief was also how the minority owners felt when STB deputy chairman Alphonso Ang delivered the decision.
Madam Asmah Atan, 59, a housewife, was ’still in a daze’ six hours later.
She told The New Paper last night: ‘We were stunned. We looked at one another, like asking, did we hear it right?’
Madam Asmah said the group had been prepared from the start that ‘it was going to be a hard fight’.
But when the news finally sank in, the group of about 20 - who had carpooled to the STB office on Maxwell Road - celebrated their victory by hugging one another.
Madam Asmah said: ‘Some of us even broke down but it was definitely tears of joy.’
Housewife Fatimah Bee Bee Ali, 49, said: ‘For us, it means we still have a place to live in, one that is big enough to accommodate our whole family.’
She and her husband, Peter Chew, 52, an aircraft engineer, live with their four teenage children, her wheelchair-bound mother and a maid.
Madam Fatimah added: ‘With the rising prices, it would really be tough to find a unit with the same area like ours.’
The minority owners felt they owed the successful result to their legal team, comprising Mr Siva Krishnasamy of Tan Lee & Partners and Mr NSreenivasan of Straits Law.
GRATEFUL
Madam Asmah said: ‘Please help us to record our gratitude. It is because of their help that we do not have to move out of the estate which we’ve grown comfortable in.’
While the sale had caused much tension and division in the estate for nearly 14 months, some residents also appeared nonchalant about the result.
Said one, who wanted to be known only as Mr Kris: ‘If we can sell, we’ll sell. If we cannot, then we’ll just stay on here.’
Others were more concerned whether the estate, which is showing signs of age, would get a facelift.
Mr Kris added: ‘They’ve probably put off all works, thinking that we can sell the place.’
Another resident, Mr J Lim, said: ‘I guess it’s time for us to start everything on a new, clean slate.
‘And maybe this decision is the best catalyst.’
Tampines Court en bloc sale thrown out despite majority vote
25 Mar 2007: Frasers Centrepoint and Far East Organization team up to buy Tampines Court - a privatised HUDC estate - through a $405 million collective sale.
25 Jul 2007: Conditions of the sales agreement are fulfilled.
7 Jan 2008: Sales committee applies to Strata Titles Board (STB) for sale approval.
Minority owners file objections. They consider the sale price of $700,000 for each unit too low.
16 to 18 Jun: STB hears objection and sets further hearing for 7 Aug. Until the hearing, the sale cannot be signed and sealed.
30 Jun: Sales committee applies to bring 7 Aug hearing earlier - before the agreement lapses on 25 Jul.
11 Jul: STB dismissed the sales committee’s request.
14 Jul: Two committee members file affidavit in High Court, saying STB failed to take into account that any hearing after 25Jul ‘will be academic’.
Other owners appeal to National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan at Meet-The-People session.
Mr Mah, MP for the Tampines ward, agreesto appeal to STB on owners’ behalf.
18 Jul: High Court orders STB to move hearing ahead of 25 Jul deadline. New date set on 21 Jul.
21 Jul: Sales committee chairman Mathew Lee takes witness stand.
He is grilled on whether he acted in the owners’ best interests on the issue of the estate’s valuation and the method of distribution of sale proceeds.
25 Jul: STB dismisses Tampines Court’s en bloc sale application.
STB deputy chairman Alphonso Ang says the board examined the evidence and found the sale was not concluded in good faith.
It will release its grounds of decision later.
Source : New Paper - 26 Jul 2008
Chris wrote:
JUSTICE NOT CARRIED OUT
In blaming the sales committee, lets make clear justice has not been carried out the sales committee has done excellent job for 2 long years 24 hours and 365 days a year without any pay or remuneration they have been working hard to bring this sale so all of us can benefit.
Submission to STB by Sales Committee (ST) was done on time STB had 6 months to resolve and they failed and breached the Act that was passed by Parliament on 19th October 2004 and assented to by the President on 4th November 2004. Further STB tried to delay decision by 1 month and that is why SC was forced to bring the matter to High Court to reverse decision on hearing date that was 1 month in delay.
Today in last moment and as instructed by High Court withing few hours deliberation STB the accused become judge and made decision in retaliating to Sales Committee in saying “Sales Not Done In Good Faith” and rejected the sale. (Note in 6 months STB was unable to make decision).
Their decision cannot be contested in High Court or Court of Appeal at all due to last minute decision and STB knowledge that developer will not seek extension due to the poor economic situation in real estate across Singapore. Due process of the law was not carried out as even developer should have been ordered to wait until all appeal has been exhausted.
Basically what we have here it is decision made by STB that cannot be challenged in High Court. Today grave injustice has been carried out against majority of residents and let it be known it is the STB who carried out grave injustice today.
Regretfully STB decision has killed hopes of majority to be able to sell home at good price and to move on and improve life and find better place to live. Commercially Tampines district has lost largest development in East and new development of 1500 modern new homes, new residents and millions of dollars in development. End loss is to every citizen of Tampines as a whole. We are no winers, now losers left with dilapidated estate without any facilities at all and in worst state than any other HDB estate.
Posted on 27-Jul-08 at 12:20 pm | Permalink
laurence ng wrote:
Thanks for the interesting Blog & Infos.
As a close neighibour in Simei, I would like to know what were the cost breakdown involved in this abortive En-Bloc episode:
A.Lawyers fee incurred during the whole course process ?
B.TC sinking/maintenance funds spent?
C.Individual expenses? if any?
D.Future cost to bring back the estate to it’s glory?
E.As TC ages, it will incur higher t/u on land lease & development etc.
F.Will there be friction / grudges and disunity in the estate i.e. frustration by the majority.
Am neutral on the outcome but concern for the future of TC residents …..Me
“Let Justice Prevail” & wishing you all the best for educating us like me about interesting articles in your Blog!
Majullah Singapura!!!to the winners….
Posted on 27-Jul-08 at 8:11 pm | Permalink