<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They were certain they would win</title>
	<link>http://www.sghousing.com/2008/07/26/they-were-certain-they-would-win/</link>
	<description>A Value-Added Singapore Real Estate Site</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: laurence ng</title>
		<link>http://www.sghousing.com/2008/07/26/they-were-certain-they-would-win/#comment-51884</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sghousing.com/2008/07/26/they-were-certain-they-would-win/#comment-51884</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the interesting Blog &#38; Infos.
As a close neighibour in Simei, I would like to know what were the cost breakdown involved in this abortive En-Bloc episode:
A.Lawyers fee incurred during the whole course process ?
B.TC sinking/maintenance funds spent? 
C.Individual expenses? if any?
D.Future cost to bring back the estate to it's glory?
E.As TC ages, it will incur higher t/u on land lease &#38; development etc.
F.Will there be friction / grudges and disunity in the estate i.e. frustration by the majority.
     
Am neutral on the outcome but concern for the future of TC residents .....Me
"Let Justice Prevail" &#38; wishing you all the best for educating us  like me about interesting articles in your Blog!

Majullah Singapura!!!to the winners....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interesting Blog &amp; Infos.<br />
As a close neighibour in Simei, I would like to know what were the cost breakdown involved in this abortive En-Bloc episode:<br />
A.Lawyers fee incurred during the whole course process ?<br />
B.TC sinking/maintenance funds spent?<br />
C.Individual expenses? if any?<br />
D.Future cost to bring back the estate to it&#8217;s glory?<br />
E.As TC ages, it will incur higher t/u on land lease &amp; development etc.<br />
F.Will there be friction / grudges and disunity in the estate i.e. frustration by the majority.</p>
<p>Am neutral on the outcome but concern for the future of TC residents &#8230;..Me<br />
&#8220;Let Justice Prevail&#8221; &amp; wishing you all the best for educating us  like me about interesting articles in your Blog!</p>
<p>Majullah Singapura!!!to the winners&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.sghousing.com/2008/07/26/they-were-certain-they-would-win/#comment-51667</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sghousing.com/2008/07/26/they-were-certain-they-would-win/#comment-51667</guid>
		<description>JUSTICE NOT CARRIED OUT 

In blaming the sales committee, lets make clear justice has not been carried out the sales committee has done excellent job for 2 long years 24 hours and 365 days a year without any pay or remuneration they have been working hard to bring this sale so all of us can benefit.

Submission to STB by Sales Committee (ST) was done on time STB had 6 months to resolve and they failed and breached the Act that was passed by Parliament on 19th October 2004 and assented to by the President on 4th November 2004.  Further STB tried to delay decision by 1 month and that is why SC was forced to bring the matter to High Court to reverse decision on hearing date that was 1 month in delay. 

Today in last moment and as instructed by High Court withing few hours deliberation STB the accused become judge and made decision in retaliating to Sales Committee in saying “Sales Not Done  In Good Faith” and rejected the sale. (Note in 6 months STB was unable to make decision).

Their decision cannot be contested in High Court or Court of Appeal at all due to last minute decision and STB knowledge that developer will not seek extension  due to the poor economic situation in real estate across Singapore. Due process of the law was not carried out as even developer should have been ordered to wait until all appeal has been exhausted.

Basically what we have here it is decision made by  STB that cannot be challenged in High Court. Today grave injustice has been carried out against majority of  residents and let it be known it is the  STB  who carried out grave injustice today. 

Regretfully STB decision has killed hopes of majority to be able to sell home at good price and to move on and improve  life and find better place to live. Commercially  Tampines district has lost largest development in East and new development of 1500 modern new homes, new residents and millions of dollars in development. End loss is to every citizen of Tampines as a whole. We are no winers, now  losers left with dilapidated estate without any facilities at all and in worst state than any other HDB estate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JUSTICE NOT CARRIED OUT </p>
<p>In blaming the sales committee, lets make clear justice has not been carried out the sales committee has done excellent job for 2 long years 24 hours and 365 days a year without any pay or remuneration they have been working hard to bring this sale so all of us can benefit.</p>
<p>Submission to STB by Sales Committee (ST) was done on time STB had 6 months to resolve and they failed and breached the Act that was passed by Parliament on 19th October 2004 and assented to by the President on 4th November 2004.  Further STB tried to delay decision by 1 month and that is why SC was forced to bring the matter to High Court to reverse decision on hearing date that was 1 month in delay. </p>
<p>Today in last moment and as instructed by High Court withing few hours deliberation STB the accused become judge and made decision in retaliating to Sales Committee in saying “Sales Not Done  In Good Faith” and rejected the sale. (Note in 6 months STB was unable to make decision).</p>
<p>Their decision cannot be contested in High Court or Court of Appeal at all due to last minute decision and STB knowledge that developer will not seek extension  due to the poor economic situation in real estate across Singapore. Due process of the law was not carried out as even developer should have been ordered to wait until all appeal has been exhausted.</p>
<p>Basically what we have here it is decision made by  STB that cannot be challenged in High Court. Today grave injustice has been carried out against majority of  residents and let it be known it is the  STB  who carried out grave injustice today. </p>
<p>Regretfully STB decision has killed hopes of majority to be able to sell home at good price and to move on and improve  life and find better place to live. Commercially  Tampines district has lost largest development in East and new development of 1500 modern new homes, new residents and millions of dollars in development. End loss is to every citizen of Tampines as a whole. We are no winers, now  losers left with dilapidated estate without any facilities at all and in worst state than any other HDB estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
